The restoration of the Vehicle License Fee
and its impact on local public
safety
by Bill Murray
As state officials grapple with how to resolve the current $38
billion budget crisis, in terms of local public safety a primary
method of getting by this year is the proposed restoration of the
Vehicle License Fee.
Back in 1998, pre-9/11 and at a time when there was a far rosier
financial outlook, the state had reduced these fees, making it
significantly more affordable to operate a car.
But now the Davis administration has asked for their reinstatement
of these fees, which were considered temporary, back to a level
that would help California survive its current budget crisis, and
have presented the issue as one of public safety.
As Governor
Gray Davis said, “The Vehicle
License Fee pays for local police and fire. Unless that fee is
returned to its 1998 level,
California will experience a severe public safety emergency.”
”When the Legislature reduced this fee in '98, it said to
cities and counties, ‘don't worry about local police and
fire, we'll write a check for the difference. But if at any point
we run out of money and we can't right a check for the difference,
then the fee has to go back up automatically,’ which is exactly
what is happening.”
LA County’s Sheriff Lee Baca reported, “The
impact to the County is so substantial that currently my budget
has a
$180 million shortfall with 900 less deputy sheriffs and 200 less
professional staff currently. And I've closed three jails, and
I have prisoners on half-time sentences, and all the community-based
policing programs have been reduced and eliminated.”
He went on
to say that without the Vehicle License Fees returning to previous
levels, “… the Sheriff's Department will
incur another $140 million cut on top of that. And clearly, we're
pretty much from the standpoint of public safety way below a minimum
standard …”
He concluded, “… the
gang problem is growing [and] people are committing more felonious
assaults as
well as murders.”
Last week Mayor
James Hahn stood with a coalition of 11 City Council members,
with whom he’d recently lost
his own budget battle. This time they took a united position,
surrounding themselves with
police officers and firefighters.
The Mayor said, “To
the state legislators and the governor we want to make one thing
perfectly clear: If
you take money from
cities, what you're doing is you're taking money away that's used
to hire police officers, that's used to put firefighters on their
trucks."
In Sacramento
Assembly Speaker Herb Wesson (D-Los Angeles/Culver City) issued
a statement regarding the reinstatement
of the vehicle
license fee saying, “Five years ago we rolled back the car
tax. We promised that it would only last as long as we had the
money to keep police officers and firefighters on the street. We
don't have that money anymore.”
“Unless we keep our promise, as many as 12,000 police officers
or up to 15,000 firefighters will lose their jobs. No one wants
to pay higher car fees. But it’s the price we must pay to
keep Californians safe.”
Wesson blames
the other party, “It's an outrage
that Republicans -- on top of holding the budget hostage and
leading a misguided
recall of the governor -- now have the cops on the street in their
extremist crosshairs.”
The fact is
there’s a lot of finger pointing and blame going
on, with state lawmakers in a stalemate about passing a state budget
at all. It’s hardly a unique situation, and if they don’t
find a way out of it by July 1st things will only get worse.
California will likely be forced to borrow enough money to keep
the state going for a few months, reportedly $11 billion, and the
interest alone will cost the taxpayers many millions.
Nearly everyone is upset about this, and well they should be.
Union groups, including the California State Employees Association,
are circulating petitions to promote something called the Budget
Accountability Act, which would hold the Governor and Legislature
more accountable to taxpayers in order to produce more responsible
and timely State budgets.
They say it’s a permanent solution for California’s
ongoing budget crisis, noting that the Legislature has not met
the June 15 constitutional deadline since 1986. And they want it
as an initiative on the March 2004 Ballot.
It says if the state budget is not passed by the constitutional
deadline, the Governor and the members of the Legislature would
permanently forfeit their salary, per diem expense allowance, and
car allowance for each day until the budget is adopted and signed
into law.
Further, the Legislature is required to remain in session and
is prohibited from acting on other legislation until the budget
is adopted. An exception is made for legislation in response to
an emergency declared by the Governor.
But that’s for the future, and the state, county and city
have desperate needs right now … starting July 1st. The current
budget proposal could reduce state revenues to California cities
by $466 million statewide, and would perhaps cost Los Angeles over
$40 million this year.
Increasing
the Vehicle License Fee back to 1998 levels will generate $4
billion, and cost the average car owner
$136 a year more. And
since it’s so closely tied to supporting public safety it’s
the one item in the proposed state budget that politicians, especially
Democrats, will perhaps rally around.
As Davis argued, “… the
fee goes back automatically to your local cities and counties
to support firefighters
and police
chief and emergency medical services, and they would just be devastated.
They couldn't function without the Vehicle License Fee.”
Republicans are calling the proposal a tax, and are determined
to not let it into the budget.
And Speaker
Wesson promised, “That's why,
starting Monday evening, Assembly Democrats will fan out throughout
California
to highlight exactly what a budget without new revenues will mean
-- fewer cops, larger class sizes and closed hospitals.”
Sheriff Baca
said without the Vehicle License Fee adjustment, “We
will, quite frankly, not be able to do the job that we are required
to do.”
Last week,
as she stood flanked by fellow council members and the Mayor,
Councilwoman Cindy Miscikowski tried to
bury the hatchet
after the recent veto of the city budget. "We are saying with
one voice Los Angeles needs to be the safest large city in the
U.S."
Chief William J. Bratton was with Mayor Hahn as he traveled to
Sacramento at weeks end to meet other mayors and public safety
officials from around the state, urging Governor Davis and state
legislators to oppose severe and ongoing cuts to cities.
“We are all united in telling the Governor and our State
Legislators – do not take away our police officers. Do not
take away our firefighters. Our thin blue line is already thin
enough,” said Mayor Hahn.
“In Los Angeles,” he said, “the
cuts on the table mean the city would lose funding for anywhere
from 350 to
750 police officers, fire fighters, or paramedics.”
|