EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is from an LAPD Press Release written
by the Chief of Police,
William Bratton. The issue is a controversial one, but Mayor Hahn
and former Chief (current Councilman) Bernard Parks both support
a merger of police departments, too.
No matter what you think, or who you support, LA Community Policing
hopes you'll go out and VOTE !
May 13, 2005
Police merger would benefit Los Angeles
Charter Amendment A aims to cut bureaucracy and improve airport
safety
by William Bratton
Los Angeles
International Airport today is not as safe as it could or should
be. The city of Los Angeles is failing the millions of people who
travel through LAX each year and the tens of thousands of people
who work there and live in the immediate vicinity by continuing
its out-of-date policy of giving two police departments the same
job of securing the airport. The current situation can lead to unnecessary
confusion, poor coordination and, as a result, a less secure airport.
But this is a problem that is easily fixed.
In this post-9-11
era, Los Angeles cannot afford to be complacent about airport security
or inflexible about needed change. Unfortunately, the current charter
does not allow the mayor or the City Council to make any changes.
Only the voters have the power to do that when they go to the polls.
A "Yes" vote on Charter Amendment A gives the political
leadership of the city a stronger voice in addressing the public
safety needs at LAX. I am hopeful that L.A'.s voters will make an
informed decision on this critical public safety issue.
Today, LAX has
two police departments with shared responsibilities -- the LAPD
with 57 officers and the Los Angeles Airport Police with 310. Oftentimes,
the two departments perform overlapping functions. It is easy to
see why this would create higher than necessary administrative costs
and operational inefficiencies. But the problems are much greater
than that.
During any terrorist
incident, major crime or emergency, the LAPD is called upon to immediately
supply additional police resources to help restore control, order
and calm. A structure forced to combine the leadership of two agencies
at the very moment when a situation is most chaotic and dangerous
creates opportunity for lack of accountability and unnecessary delay
in achieving a prompt and safe resolution. Recall the confusion
surrounding the boarding of a suspected hijacked Singapore airliner,
or those initial chaotic moments of the July 4, 2002, El Al shooting.
It makes no
sense to have a police force at the airport that does not have within
its own organizational and command structure all of the resources
necessary to respond to the most dangerous crisis. It would be cost-
prohibitive to expand the airport police force when the city already
has an agency, the LAPD, that has all of those capabilities and
capacities. We have to fix this. It is my belief not only as chief
of the LAPD but also as a city resident, voter and frequent user
of the airport that the passage of Amendment A is the critical first
step.
A recent independent
study concluded that the airport police should adopt LAPD policies
on use of force, vehicle pursuits and other operational standards
and undergo LAPD's police academy training. All of these are good
suggestions, but we need to take it to the next logical step --
merge the departments and eliminate the wasteful and potentially
confusing problem of having two chiefs in charge. Today there are
simply "too many cooks in the kitchen." We need a gradual,
carefully considered merger that creates an LAPD Airport Bureau
reporting to the executive director of the airport and the Airport
Commission that would provide uniform policies and procedures and
command and control over all police and security resources. The
merger would save money, but more importantly, we would have a safer
airport for tens of millions of passengers, LAX employees and those
who have businesses and homes nearby.
My ultimate
goal as chief of the LAPD is to merge the Airport Police Department
and its highly dedicated, professional men and women into the ranks
of the LAPD, thus increasing their career and promotional opportunities.
A merger would also reduce duplicate bureaucracies and free up significant
numbers of officers for increased visibility and effectiveness.
My support of this merger is also based on my experience as New
York City police commissioner. In 1995, the separate Transit and
Public Housing Police were merged into the NYPD. There were significant
improvements in public safety in both the city's public housing
and transit environments.
Even in the
midst of a contentious mayoral election campaign, there is at least
one issue on which Mayor James Hahn and Councilman Antonio Villaraigosa
agree -- we need to improve security at LAX by placing one police
department, the LAPD, in charge of this vital mission.
On Tuesday,
voters get to make the critical decision when considering Charter
Amendment A.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
http://www.lapdonline.org/press_releases/2005/05/ed05001.htm
|