|  | Police 
              Accountability and the Efficacy of Crime Analysis
 Begins with an Open Input Process
 by 
              Andrew Garstenandrew.garsten@sbcglobal.net
 
 April 3, 2003
 
 As Chief Bratton continues to develop the high tech COMPSTAT system 
              to track crime statistics and deploy resources in a more real-time 
              manner, a fatal and unglamorous flaw of the system may remain unnoticed 
              and unimproved. This is the "input," or reporting side of the system 
              for both crimes and tips.
 
 While 911 emergencies (ultimately) get through and into the crime 
              reporting system, post-incident/non-emergency reports or tips are 
              dependent on reporting into the local station, and in particular 
              to the "Desk." If my experiences are any indication, calls to the 
              "desk" are often unanswered, or the number is busy beyond reason. 
              Tipsters may fear speaking to a person because they want to be anonymous, 
              thus never calling with important information regarding clues or 
              evidence.
 
 The effect of this is that people give up. And when they give up, 
              the statistical impact of that crime is zero. Tips never come in.
 
 Accountability begins by allowing ordinary people to always be able 
              to get through and make a report. No report, no accountability.
 
 The following are two suggestions where the reporting bottleneck 
              can be opened up effectively by avoiding the most likely cause - 
              the human operator. If solutions can be implemented to divert 20-30% 
              of the incoming reports, the person working the "Desk" should be 
              better able to answer ALL the calls that remain.
 
 Automated Crime Reporting Method 1: Voice Menu and Recording
 
 By using voice prompts and either state-of-the-art voice recognition 
              or even good old fashion touch tone key responses, a citizen should 
              be able to place a call and file a report, without speaking with 
              a human operator. Traceability can be achieved through Caller ID. 
              Anonymity can be achieved at caller's request by stripping Caller 
              ID from the record.
 
 Automated Crime Reporting Method 2: Web Base Reporting
 
 This might be the easiest of all. Go to a web page for your local 
              station, or even one for LAPD city-wide, and complete a written 
              report. If we can get building permits through the web, we should 
              be able to file a crime report. Traceability can be optional, with 
              the user adding only the contact information they wish.
 
 Benefits
 
               
                |  | If 
                  the reports have certain fixed menu responses, like "1 for auto 
                  theft," "2 for personal property theft," "3 for vandalism," 
                  and "4 for graffiti", some reports will have automated classification. |   
                |  |   | Automatically 
                  Classified Reports should be able to go immediately into the 
                  COMPSTAT system, |   
                |  |   | Automatically 
                  Classified Reports should be able to automatically be queued 
                  into the right detective's inbox, |   
                |  |   | Response 
                  times could be increased. |   
                |  | Voice 
                  and Web Records are digital, with no possibility of transposition 
                  errors or generational degradation from copying. |   
                |  | Full 
                  anonymity is possible, allowing these systems to doubles as 
                  a full time crime tip systems. |  Quickly 
              Implement A Try-Before-You-Buy Program
 Both these ideas should be quickly tried as one-off experiments 
              at different stations. These are not expensive systems to deploy. 
              Limited experimentation with a real solution is a better option 
              than wasting the taxpayer's money with nine months of studies and 
              debate that will no more likely assure success. None of these ideas 
              could possibly make things worse, and learning from real experience 
              will give LAPD the knowledge to effectively design a department 
              wide system for bid that addresses real life issues effectively.
 
 Conclusion
 
 Implementation of Automated Crime Reporting And Tipping Systems 
              (ACRATS) will remove some of the bottlenecks currently associated 
              with non-911 reporting methods, thus encouraging a higher percentage 
              of crimes to be reported. The more crimes reported the more realistic 
              COMPSTAT data becomes. The more realistic the COMPSTAT data is, 
              the more effective LAPD is in reversing crime trends through precise 
              resource deployment.
 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 Andrew Garsten
 
 andrew.garsten@sbcglobal.net
 
 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 EDITOR'S 
              NOTE: Other works by Andrew Garsten, a frequent contributor to LA 
              Community Policing who resides in Echo Park, can be found through 
              the following LACP link: Andrew 
              GarstenEchoing about community involvement
 |  |