|
September 2, 2004
Honorable Members
Los Angeles City Council
Room 395, City Hall
NEIGHBORHOOD
COUNCIL ELECTION PROCEDURES
Executive Summary
The Neighborhood Council Election Procedures Working Group (Working
Group) has completed its work on the Neighborhood Council Election
Procedures (Election Procedures) and hereby transmits these proposed
Election Procedures to the City Council for its consideration and
further action (see Exhibit I).
click here:
NC
Election Procedures - Draft 22 - 090204.doc
The Working Group was
ultimately composed of representatives of 10 Neighborhood Councils,
the Board of Neighborhood Commissioners (BONC), the Los Angeles
League of Women Voters, the City Attorney, the City Clerk and the
Department of Neighborhood Empowerment (DONE). In addition, DONE
conducted a series of public forums on the proposed Election Procedures
prior to finalization by the Working Group (see Exhibit II).
The proposed Election Procedures represent the culmination of a
one-year effort by the Working Group, with the support of DONE,
to:
1) |
develop a set of minimum standards
that could be utilized in all Neighborhood Council Governing
Board Member Elections to ensure fair, open and inclusive elections
that protect the basic voting rights of the stakeholders; |
2) |
provide flexibility within those
minimum standards to reflect the diversity of approaches to
elections by the various Neighborhood Councils; and |
3) |
provide a foundation or tool to
assist Neighborhood Councils in developing the specific set
of election procedures for their own elections. |
The key elements of the
proposed Election Procedures include:
Transparency
The proposed Election Procedures include a number of provisions
that enhance the openness of the process and the information available
to stakeholders. Such provisions include: requiring that a Neighborhood
Council’s election procedures be approved 90 days before the election
and be adopted in a publicly noticed meeting 60 days before the
election; establishing the minimum outreach and public notice requirements;
strengthening the disclosure of candidate filing status; and providing
basic standards for stakeholder registration and voting day participation.
Flexibility
The proposed Election Procedures allow Neighborhood Councils to
“customize” their election to meet their unique community needs
by choosing from a number of election modules (e.g. vote-by-mail,
single or multiple polling sites, etc.).
Standard Process For Resolving Challenges
The proposed Election Procedures protect voter/stakeholder and candidate
rights by establishing standard recount and challenge resolution
procedures that are open and timely.
Empowering Neighborhood Councils
The proposed Election Procedures remove DONE and any other City
agency from the actual administration of elections and the resolution
of challenges. Rather, trained volunteers drawn from the greater
Neighborhood Council community and other interested organizations
will perform those functions.
After extensive deliberation, including consideration of the input
from the public forums, the Working Group believes that the proposed
Election Procedures should be made part of the Plan for Neighborhood
Councils adopted by the City Council. Additionally, the City Council
should establish an eight-month transition period after which compliance
with all provisions of the Election Procedures would be mandatory.
This transition period recognizes that Neighborhood Councils are
in various stages of conducting their elections and full compliance
with some of the early filing deadlines would result in the delay
of some currently scheduled elections. It will be responsibility
of DONE to ensure that the Neighborhood Councils comply with essential
provisions of the Election Procedures during the transition period.
It should be noted that DONE has reorganized and established an
Election and Policy Development Team, headed by a Senior Project
Coordinator, that specializes in providing support to Neighborhood
Councils as they conduct their elections. This Team has already
developed a number of election support procedures and tools to assist
Neighborhood Councils and many of the Neighborhood Councils are
already conducting their elections based on the proposed Election
Procedures.
Recommendations
1) |
That the City Council approve
the Election Procedures as submitted by the Working Group and
direct the City Attorney to prepare amendments to the Citywide
Plan for a System of Neighborhood Councils (“Plan”) to incorporate
the Election Procedures into the Plan and prepare any necessary
accompanying changes to the Ordinance that implements the plan. |
2) |
That the City Council approve
an eight-month transition period, from the date of its adoption
of the amended Plan, for mandatory full compliance with all
provisions of the Election Procedures. |
3) |
That the City Council direct DONE
to report back to the City Council on the implementation of
the Election Procedures no later than 60 days after the eightmonth
transition period. |
Discussion
Process
Pursuant to direction from the City Council’s Education and Neighborhoods
Committee (re: Council File No. 03-1104), the Working Group was
formed and began meeting in late September 2003. The Working Group
was ultimately composed of representatives of 10 Neighborhood Councils,
the Board of Neighborhood Commissioners (BONC), the Los Angeles
League of Women Voters, the City Attorney, the City Clerk and DONE.
The Working Group met every other week through the end of March
2004 in a publicly noticed meeting to discuss and draft the Election
Procedures. Each subsequent draft version of the Election Procedures
was made available to the public at the meetings and on the DONE
web site. Public comment was taken throughout the development of
the Election Procedures during the meetings of the Working Group
and via e-mail. The development of the Election Procedures reflects
an approach where Neighborhood Councils were involved in the actual
drafting of the provisions, not just in reviewing and commenting
on a finished product.
On April 5, 2004, the Working Group transmitted its “final draft”
of the proposed Election Procedures to DONE. DONE then took a series
of actions to obtain input on the proposed Election Procedures from
the greater Neighborhood Council community.
|
Reformatted the Election Procedures
into a “tabbed” format to facilitate understanding and use. |
|
Distributed the Election Procedures
widely via the Internet and then conducted a series of public
forums, starting with two workshops at the May 22, 2004 Congress
of Neighborhoods. |
|
Organized the input received and
presented a summary to the Working Group in a report dated August
10, 2004. |
The objectives of the
Working Group, were to develop Election Procedures that would:
|
Provide a set of minimum standards
that could be utilized in all Neighborhood Council Governing
Board Member Elections to ensure fair, open and inclusive elections
that protect the basic voting rights of the stakeholders. |
|
Provide flexibility within those
minimum standards to reflect the diversity of approaches to
elections by the various Neighborhood Councils throughout the
City. |
|
Provide a foundation or tool to
assist Neighborhood Councils in developing the specific set
of election procedures for their own Governing Board Member
Elections. |
Key Elements of the
Draft Election Procedures
Transparency
Nothing undermines the legitimacy of an election more than the perception
that decisions about the process are made in secret, with little
or no public notice, to benefit a particular set of candidates.
The proposed Election Procedures include a number of provisions
that enhance the openness of the process and the information available
to stakeholders. Such provisions include: requiring that a Neighborhood
Council’s Election Procedures be approved 90 days before the election
and be adopted in a publicly noticed meeting 60 days before the
election; establishing the minimum outreach and public notice requirements;
strengthening disclosure of candidate filing status; providing basic
standards for stakeholder registration and voting day participation.
Flexibility
The Working Group recognized that the Neighborhood Councils have
unique issues and capabilities that impact the optimum method for
conducting elections. The proposed Election Procedures allow Neighborhood
Councils to “customize” their election to meet their unique community
needs by choosing from a number of election modules (e.g. voteby-
mail, single or multiple polling sites, etc.). Those standards that
are mandated across the entire system, such as minimum requirements
for outreach and public notice, flow from the objective of protecting
stakeholder voting rights.
Standard Process For Resolving Challenges
The proposed Election Procedures protect voter/stakeholder and candidate
rights by establishing procedures for initiating an election recount
or filing a challenge to the election. The procedures specify the
process for filing a recount or challenge request, the parties responsible
for conducting the recount or resolving the challenge, the maximum
time frame for completing the recount or challenge review, and the
public notice requirements associated with conducting the recount
or the challenge review and announcing the results.
Empowering Neighborhood Councils
The proposed Election Procedures remove DONE and any other City
agency from the actual administration of elections and the resolution
of challenges. Rather, trained volunteers drawn from the greater
Neighborhood Council community and other interested organizations
will perform those functions.
A key role provided for in the proposed Election Procedures is that
of the Independent Election Administrator (IEA). The proposed Election
Procedures vest the responsibility and authority for conducting
the actual election with the IEA. To act in the capacity of an IEA,
a person must have received training from DONE and have had actual
experience in assisting in the conduct of a Neighborhood Council
election. The IEA will be responsible for all aspects of the election,
including candidate filing, stakeholder verification, tabulating
and certifying the vote count, and conducting any required recounts.
The IEA will also have the authority to postpone an election if
the IEA determines that an election cannot be conducted in accordance
with a Neighborhood Council’s approved election procedures. It is
expected that the IEA will utilize the assistance of the Neighborhood
Council in terms of labor and material resources. However, the IEA
will retain ultimate responsibility for conducting the election
and handling any recount activity. A list of certified IEAs will
be established and Neighborhood Councils can add additional qualified
persons to the list. The IEA will be named by the Neighborhood Council
in their election procedures.
The proposed Election Procedures also provide for the establishment
of a pool of persons put forward by the Neighborhood Councils to
act as Third Party Arbitrators to resolve election challenges. All
persons serving as Third Party Arbitrators will receive training
from DONE. When a challenge is filed, a minimum three-member panel
will be drawn from the pool, on a rotating basis, to resolve the
challenge.
Transition Period
There are now some 82 certified Neighborhood Councils. These Neighborhood
Councils are in various stages relative to conducting their first
or subsequent elections. Accordingly, the Working Group believes
that the City Council should establish an eightmonth transition
period after which compliance with all provisions of the proposed
Election Procedures would be mandatory. This transition period recognizes
that full compliance with some of the early filing deadlines would
result in the delay of some currently scheduled elections. It will
be responsibility of DONE to ensure that the Neighborhood Councils
comply with essential provisions of the Election Procedures during
the transition period.
Amending the Election Procedures
Experience over time in conducting Neighborhood Council elections
under the proposed Election Procedures will undoubtedly demonstrate
the need to amend the procedures. The continuing evolution of election
procedures is a common occurrence. For example, the City Election
Code has been amended 32 times since the current version was adopted
in 1946. The proposed Election Procedures include provisions to
allow a Neighborhood Council to request an amendment. In addition,
there is nothing that would stop DONE or the City Council from initiating
an amendment.
In conclusion, I want to take this opportunity to express my appreciation
to all the Working Group members. The members spent numerous hours
of their own time both in the actual meetings and outside of the
meetings while reviewing and preparing written comments on the proposed
Election Procedures. Each of the members brought unique perspectives
to the development of the proposed Election Procedures and the final
product has been greatly enriched by their input.
I also want to express my appreciation to the DONE staff, without
whose assistance the Working Group could not have completed its
task. The creation of the tabbed version and the organization and
conduct of the public forums were critical to the development of
the final proposed Election Procedures.
If you have any questions or require additional information, please
contact me directly at (213) 978-1023 or via e-mail at fmartinez@clerk.lacity.org.
Sincerely,
Frank T. Martinez, Chairperson
Neighborhood Council Election Procedures Working Group
Enclosures
Cc w/enclosures: Board of Neighborhood Commissioners
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
NC
Election Procedures - Draft 22 - 090204.doc
Election
Procedures Working Group - Agenda
Election
Procedures Working Group - Minutes
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|